I prefer the government to
intervene and stabilize the economy by using Demand-side policies. Demand-side policy focuses on government
intervention to shift aggregate demand in or out depending on whether
unemployment or inflation is the most pressing issue. The government can adjust
the aggregate demand by either change the tax rate or changing government spending.
I think using demand-side policy is more effective in keeping the economy
stable because what matters the most is what’s the consumers thinking about
(since they are the ones who pay the money). Government can decrease the tax
rate in order to increase the demand for purchasing. The government can also
increase its spending to stimulate the demanding. For example, in the 1930s
depression, President Roosevelt increased the government spending for constructing
infrastructure thus provides job opportunities for civilians. In the end, it
showed that it did work. Meanwhile, demand-side policies have their weakness:
time lags. Demand-side policies are useful for getting out of a recession, but
by the time the government is able to determine where the country's economy is
located, it is too late to fix things. Congress is too slow to
act. Government policies often come too late and it can cause inflation.
No comments:
Post a Comment