I used to think that economy is boring: who cares about the theories
when you pay the prices? But as the materials we covered grow, I gradually
realize that purchasing an item is not only simply paying the money. It involves
a more complicated process of manufacturing, taxing, and the flowing of the
money. The basic concepts of economy are not only related with other subject,
but also appeared in our daily life. Buying an item from a store might be a
simple decision for a consumer. Yet when the decisions of all consumers gather,
it brings a huge impact on the demand, increases the economic growth, and thus
makes the government to do actions. At the beginning of the course we were
introduced to some fundamental ideas, however, as the class went further, we
received more and more complicated information. Although in the college I am
not aiming for an economic major, learning high school economy definitely benefits
at a certain degree. I would prefer to develop more detailed concepts in
microeconomic since it relates more to personal economic application than
macroeconomic does. Even I will not be an economic major, knowing how the tax
system works is essential, after all.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Friday, May 17, 2013
Topic 13: Supply or Demand?
I prefer the government to
intervene and stabilize the economy by using Demand-side policies. Demand-side policy focuses on government
intervention to shift aggregate demand in or out depending on whether
unemployment or inflation is the most pressing issue. The government can adjust
the aggregate demand by either change the tax rate or changing government spending.
I think using demand-side policy is more effective in keeping the economy
stable because what matters the most is what’s the consumers thinking about
(since they are the ones who pay the money). Government can decrease the tax
rate in order to increase the demand for purchasing. The government can also
increase its spending to stimulate the demanding. For example, in the 1930s
depression, President Roosevelt increased the government spending for constructing
infrastructure thus provides job opportunities for civilians. In the end, it
showed that it did work. Meanwhile, demand-side policies have their weakness:
time lags. Demand-side policies are useful for getting out of a recession, but
by the time the government is able to determine where the country's economy is
located, it is too late to fix things. Congress is too slow to
act. Government policies often come too late and it can cause inflation.
Friday, May 10, 2013
Topic 12: Role of the Government
When the term liberalism
first introduced to Western economics, many Western countries adopted this idea
and became what they are now--strong countries. I think government indeed should
believe in market, putting their hands out of the economy. Their role is only
limited to keeping people safe, defending the country's borders, and providing
a fertile environment for markets. With the hand of government interference “removed
from markets, the invisible force of supply and demand can work out the most efficient
patterns of production, exchange, and consumption” (Goldstein & Pevehouse
286), prosperity would be brought to people. One recent example of government interference
causing inefficiency is the Taiwanese taxation of capital gains on securities. The
government put tax onto the stocks, so when stock increase its value to certain
points, stockholder have to pay the tax. The government set this system is
primarily for “social justice”, which wealthier people have to afford more tax.
Yet, it turns out that people are discouraged to participate in economic activities
(since they have to pay more money) and the government can’t earn the revenue
from this system because everyone will sell their stock before it cross over
the set point. As a result, the best way for government to deal with economy is
leave it along.
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Topic 11: Unemployment
Jobs that are more resistant to unemployment are the ones that the
society needs. Careers such as doctors, cooks, engineers…etc. are the ones people
need. People would always get sick, would always need food, and would always
want more advanced technology. As long as people want to live, the demand
exists. Workers in those fields thus are hard to be replaced. Oppositely, jobs
are less resistant to unemployment are the ones that don’t require skills and
easy to be replaced. Since everyone can do it, the employer can be relatively easier
to find cheaper worker who wants to do the job. As a result there is a higher
chance for the worker to get fired at any time. For my future career I want to
be a psychologist. As people’s physical needs are fulfilled, they start to
require cares for mental states. Since psychological treatments gradually
become the society’s need, psychologists might be more resistant to unemployment.
Yet, one concern is that there are more and more people study in this field,
which increase the supply and make the competition harder. It raises the
potential risk for unemployment. Despite concerning if I can survive by doing
that career, interest in studying psychology plays an important role in motivating
and pursuing me of being a psychologist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)